header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 160, Issue 7445

08 December 2010
IN THIS ISSUE

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) has just completed the first ever analysis of the appointment of solicitors to judicial roles.

Television courtroom broadcasting remains controversial...

Bribery is rumoured to be rife in sport...

Susan Nash reflects on the significance
of recent human rights judgments

In the first of two articles, Jane Mayfield considers the rationale behind the IoD’s new corporate governance framework

Feast or famine: Another Good Harvest? Siobhan Jones reports

Dominic Regan assesses the Birmingham costs management pilot scheme

Theo Huckle reports on industrial diseases & employer liability

What hope for outcomes focused regulation? Michael Garson reports

Keith Patten applauds the courts’ efforts to uphold Parliament’s intention for s 33

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
Law firm trainees are choosing US firms over their UK comparators, according to Chambers’ annual report on UK trainee satisfaction
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
back-to-top-scroll