header-logo header-logo

Taking a risk or two

09 December 2010 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

What hope for outcomes focused regulation? Michael Garson reports

Every month seems to bring another change; each headlined as more important than the last. So how might outcomes focused regulation (OFR) turn out to be any different? Clients will still demand excellent service, pricing will remain competitive, new challenges will arise and the same old issues will cause tension and friction from time to time. If the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) only features in your life cycle at work once a year for renewal of professional indemnity, client account audit and practicing certificates, then will it be any different after October 2011?

The answer might be that for an overwhelming majority little would be different—at least on the surface, even though more of your time and resource could be involved in a more intrusive process of reporting that demands more systematic policies and supervision. It could be that the same 10% of firms that have problems with the regulatory arm now, will continue to have difficulties to overcome in the future. Alternatively, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll