header-logo header-logo

09 December 2010 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Taking a risk or two

What hope for outcomes focused regulation? Michael Garson reports

Every month seems to bring another change; each headlined as more important than the last. So how might outcomes focused regulation (OFR) turn out to be any different? Clients will still demand excellent service, pricing will remain competitive, new challenges will arise and the same old issues will cause tension and friction from time to time. If the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) only features in your life cycle at work once a year for renewal of professional indemnity, client account audit and practicing certificates, then will it be any different after October 2011?

The answer might be that for an overwhelming majority little would be different—at least on the surface, even though more of your time and resource could be involved in a more intrusive process of reporting that demands more systematic policies and supervision. It could be that the same 10% of firms that have problems with the regulatory arm now, will continue to have difficulties to overcome in the future. Alternatively, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll