header-logo header-logo

Taking a risk or two

09 December 2010 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

What hope for outcomes focused regulation? Michael Garson reports

Every month seems to bring another change; each headlined as more important than the last. So how might outcomes focused regulation (OFR) turn out to be any different? Clients will still demand excellent service, pricing will remain competitive, new challenges will arise and the same old issues will cause tension and friction from time to time. If the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) only features in your life cycle at work once a year for renewal of professional indemnity, client account audit and practicing certificates, then will it be any different after October 2011?

The answer might be that for an overwhelming majority little would be different—at least on the surface, even though more of your time and resource could be involved in a more intrusive process of reporting that demands more systematic policies and supervision. It could be that the same 10% of firms that have problems with the regulatory arm now, will continue to have difficulties to overcome in the future. Alternatively, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll