header-logo header-logo

Taking a risk or two

09 December 2010 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

What hope for outcomes focused regulation? Michael Garson reports

Every month seems to bring another change; each headlined as more important than the last. So how might outcomes focused regulation (OFR) turn out to be any different? Clients will still demand excellent service, pricing will remain competitive, new challenges will arise and the same old issues will cause tension and friction from time to time. If the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) only features in your life cycle at work once a year for renewal of professional indemnity, client account audit and practicing certificates, then will it be any different after October 2011?

The answer might be that for an overwhelming majority little would be different—at least on the surface, even though more of your time and resource could be involved in a more intrusive process of reporting that demands more systematic policies and supervision. It could be that the same 10% of firms that have problems with the regulatory arm now, will continue to have difficulties to overcome in the future. Alternatively, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll