header-logo header-logo

09 December 2010 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Taking a risk or two

What hope for outcomes focused regulation? Michael Garson reports

Every month seems to bring another change; each headlined as more important than the last. So how might outcomes focused regulation (OFR) turn out to be any different? Clients will still demand excellent service, pricing will remain competitive, new challenges will arise and the same old issues will cause tension and friction from time to time. If the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) only features in your life cycle at work once a year for renewal of professional indemnity, client account audit and practicing certificates, then will it be any different after October 2011?

The answer might be that for an overwhelming majority little would be different—at least on the surface, even though more of your time and resource could be involved in a more intrusive process of reporting that demands more systematic policies and supervision. It could be that the same 10% of firms that have problems with the regulatory arm now, will continue to have difficulties to overcome in the future. Alternatively, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll