header-logo header-logo

Ready for take off?

09 December 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan assesses the Birmingham costs management pilot scheme

It was a surprise for me and a horrible shock for the legal profession to discover that the master of the rolls and Jackson LJ had appointed me to oversee and report upon the Birmingham Mercantile Court costs pilot.

I reported to them last month. My report was delivered in confidence for I had some harsh things to say about certain people and their (in) activities. What follows are my considered thoughts about the scheme.

What happens is this. At the case management conference the parties are expected to have completed an excel spreadsheet indicating their proposed expenditure. The judge will consider this information and decide if it is reasonable. If not, he will identify ways of cutting costs. He is not costs-capping, an expensive and laborious task which few are fit to perform.

Man of the moment

The man running the show is His Honour Judge Simon Brown QC whom I

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll