header-logo header-logo

09 December 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Ready for take off?

Dominic Regan assesses the Birmingham costs management pilot scheme

It was a surprise for me and a horrible shock for the legal profession to discover that the master of the rolls and Jackson LJ had appointed me to oversee and report upon the Birmingham Mercantile Court costs pilot.

I reported to them last month. My report was delivered in confidence for I had some harsh things to say about certain people and their (in) activities. What follows are my considered thoughts about the scheme.

What happens is this. At the case management conference the parties are expected to have completed an excel spreadsheet indicating their proposed expenditure. The judge will consider this information and decide if it is reasonable. If not, he will identify ways of cutting costs. He is not costs-capping, an expensive and laborious task which few are fit to perform.

Man of the moment

The man running the show is His Honour Judge Simon Brown QC whom I

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll