header-logo header-logo

theo_huckle_ls

Theo Huckle KC

Barrister
Theo Huckle KC was Counsel General for Wales during 2011-16. He is now in sole practice at theohuckleqc.com and Associate at Doughty Street, Apex (Cardiff), Cornwall St Chambers (Birmingham/Oxford/Shrewsbury) and No 18 Chambers (Southampton).

 

Barrister
Theo Huckle KC was Counsel General for Wales during 2011-16. He is now in sole practice at theohuckleqc.com and Associate at Doughty Street, Apex (Cardiff), Cornwall St Chambers (Birmingham/Oxford/Shrewsbury) and No 18 Chambers (Southampton).

 

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Letter to the editor
How to tell who is telling the truth? Theo Huckle KC sets out some valuable guidance from the courts on assessing a witness’s honesty
What price justice? In a second update on the parlous state of our justice system, Theo Huckle QC explains why all of our people’s legal rights should be real and enforceable
In the first of a special two-part series, Theo Huckle QC explains how the talking-down of lawyers over many years shows a serious lack of leadership in public debate
The PO cases bring into sharp relief serious failings & inaccessibility on both criminal & civil sides of our justice system, says Theo Huckle QC
Theo Huckle QC puts UK anti-discrimination laws & inequality in the spotlight & asks what we can do to effect lasting change
Why the diagnosis and treatment of non‑COVID patients with potentially life threatening conditions must be accelerated
Theo Huckle QC, Nick Brown and Frederick Powell
Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll