header-logo header-logo

Good intentions

05 July 2007 / Bilal Rawat
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Does the long-awaited corporate manslaughter legislation represent a lost opportunity? asks Bilal Rawat

Alongside the ritual demise of British hopes at Wimbledon, the summer of 2006 was marked by predictions that an offence of corporate manslaughter would be enacted by April 2007. Sadly, these proved premature. A commitment to introduce legislation on corporate killing first appeared in the Labour manifesto of 1997. With the departure of Tony Blair still fresh in our minds, it has yet to become law. There remains cautious optimism that this measure will be implemented before the end of the year.

A NEW STATUTORY OFFENCE

Currently, a company can only be convicted of the common law offence of gross negligence manslaughter if an officer is first found guilty of the same offence. That person must be identified as a “directing mind” of the company—someone so senior as to embody the organisation. This is the identification principle. In prosecutions involving large organisations with complex management structures it has proved difficult to identify a directing mind to establish liability. The seven successful prosecutions since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll