header-logo header-logo

Good intentions

05 July 2007 / Bilal Rawat
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Does the long-awaited corporate manslaughter legislation represent a lost opportunity? asks Bilal Rawat

Alongside the ritual demise of British hopes at Wimbledon, the summer of 2006 was marked by predictions that an offence of corporate manslaughter would be enacted by April 2007. Sadly, these proved premature. A commitment to introduce legislation on corporate killing first appeared in the Labour manifesto of 1997. With the departure of Tony Blair still fresh in our minds, it has yet to become law. There remains cautious optimism that this measure will be implemented before the end of the year.

A NEW STATUTORY OFFENCE

Currently, a company can only be convicted of the common law offence of gross negligence manslaughter if an officer is first found guilty of the same offence. That person must be identified as a “directing mind” of the company—someone so senior as to embody the organisation. This is the identification principle. In prosecutions involving large organisations with complex management structures it has proved difficult to identify a directing mind to establish liability. The seven successful prosecutions since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll