header-logo header-logo

Government does not know how many children have mothers in prison

02 July 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Charities , Human rights
printer mail-detail
A parliamentary committee has called for an end to the COVID-19 visiting ban on children whose mothers are in prison

The Joint Committee on Human Rights also urged the Home Office to consider the temporary release of all low-risk mothers, pregnant women and women in mother and baby units from prison, in a report published this week, ‘Human rights and the government's response to COVID-19: children whose mothers are in prison’.

The committee said it heard ‘heartfelt evidence from children separated from their mother’ during its inquiry in June. It heard how the prohibition of visits in response to the pandemic and the inability of the early release programme to reunite mothers with their children had put at risk the right to family life for an estimated 17,000 children with mothers in prison. However, the exact number is not known.

According to the committee report, the government does not have ‘even the most basic information’ about the numbers of women in prison who are separated from dependent children.

The committee recommended that children be allowed to visit on a socially distanced basis, where safe to do so, and that it should be mandatory to ask all women entering prison whether they have dependent children and what their ages are. Moreover, prisons should undertake an annual census asking women whether they have children and what their ages are. This information should be collated and published.

It also recommended that, where a prisoner would previously have been able to attend a funeral of a close family member in person, arrangements must be made for them to attend remotely.

Committee chair, Harriet Harman MP said: ‘One of the fundamental human rights is the right to family life.

‘It is children for whom this right is most important. Yet when the government banned children from visiting their mother in prison they trampled over that right.

‘They can put that right now by early release for those mothers who can safely go back home with their children and re-instating visits for the rest. COVID-19 causes lasting injury. But so does separating a child from its mother. The way to protect public health is not to damage children but to release low risk mothers and reinstate socially distanced visits.’

Find the report at: https://bit.ly/2YStPIC.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Druces LLP—Daniel Lloyd

Druces LLP—Daniel Lloyd

Corporate and commercial team welcomes technology specialist as partner

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Spector Constant & Williams—Anna Christou

Spector Constant & Williams—Anna Christou

Real estate finance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll