header-logo header-logo

Government obliged to retain e-mails

23 January 2009
Categories: Legal News , Media , Public , Human rights , Data protection
printer mail-detail

New Directive a "proportionate interference" with the right to privacy

Internet service providers (ISPs) will have to retain the details of all e-mails sent in the UK under new rules which come into force in March.
European Directive 2006/24/EC will require ISPs to record the timing and number of electronic communications. Although the content of the e-mails does not have to be retained, the new regime could result in the government having to pay up to £25m to ISPs for the storage of data.
Human rights organisation Liberty has condemned the adoption of the Directive as the first step in the creation of central government database and an attack on civil liberties.
Penelope Thornton, an associate in intellectual property, media and technology at Lovells, says that while some may view the rules as an encroachment on fundamental rights of privacy, the Directive is intentionally limited in its scope.
“The stated purpose of the Directive is to assist in the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, particularly organised crime, and therefore the information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll