header-logo header-logo

Government obliged to retain e-mails

23 January 2009
Categories: Legal News , Media , Public , Human rights , Data protection
printer mail-detail

New Directive a "proportionate interference" with the right to privacy

Internet service providers (ISPs) will have to retain the details of all e-mails sent in the UK under new rules which come into force in March.
European Directive 2006/24/EC will require ISPs to record the timing and number of electronic communications. Although the content of the e-mails does not have to be retained, the new regime could result in the government having to pay up to £25m to ISPs for the storage of data.
Human rights organisation Liberty has condemned the adoption of the Directive as the first step in the creation of central government database and an attack on civil liberties.
Penelope Thornton, an associate in intellectual property, media and technology at Lovells, says that while some may view the rules as an encroachment on fundamental rights of privacy, the Directive is intentionally limited in its scope.
“The stated purpose of the Directive is to assist in the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, particularly organised crime, and therefore the information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Firm launches business immigration practice with dual partner hire

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Scottish offering strengthened with dispute resolution partner hire in Glasgow

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll