header-logo header-logo

23 January 2009
Categories: Legal News , Media , Public , Human rights , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Government obliged to retain e-mails

New Directive a "proportionate interference" with the right to privacy

Internet service providers (ISPs) will have to retain the details of all e-mails sent in the UK under new rules which come into force in March.
European Directive 2006/24/EC will require ISPs to record the timing and number of electronic communications. Although the content of the e-mails does not have to be retained, the new regime could result in the government having to pay up to £25m to ISPs for the storage of data.
Human rights organisation Liberty has condemned the adoption of the Directive as the first step in the creation of central government database and an attack on civil liberties.
Penelope Thornton, an associate in intellectual property, media and technology at Lovells, says that while some may view the rules as an encroachment on fundamental rights of privacy, the Directive is intentionally limited in its scope.
“The stated purpose of the Directive is to assist in the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, particularly organised crime, and therefore the information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll