header-logo header-logo

Government obliged to retain e-mails

23 January 2009
Categories: Legal News , Media , Public , Human rights , Data protection
printer mail-detail

New Directive a "proportionate interference" with the right to privacy

Internet service providers (ISPs) will have to retain the details of all e-mails sent in the UK under new rules which come into force in March.
European Directive 2006/24/EC will require ISPs to record the timing and number of electronic communications. Although the content of the e-mails does not have to be retained, the new regime could result in the government having to pay up to £25m to ISPs for the storage of data.
Human rights organisation Liberty has condemned the adoption of the Directive as the first step in the creation of central government database and an attack on civil liberties.
Penelope Thornton, an associate in intellectual property, media and technology at Lovells, says that while some may view the rules as an encroachment on fundamental rights of privacy, the Directive is intentionally limited in its scope.
“The stated purpose of the Directive is to assist in the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, particularly organised crime, and therefore the information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to headinternational insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll