header-logo header-logo

Government presses ahead with overhaul of immigration rules

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

News

The government has published its proposals for employing skilled and temporary migrant workers in the latest phase of its overhaul of the immigration system. The schemes—known as Tier 2 and Tier 5 of the new pointsbased system—follow a lengthy review of the ’s immigration rules and the introduction of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 this year. Natalie Black, a lawyer at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says Tier 2 aims to amalgamate some of the many ways that skilled workers can enter and work in the , including the work permit scheme. She says: “Prospective workers under this tier will have to earn a certain number of points based on their skills, standard of English and prospective salary. The threshold of points required will change depending on the requirements of businesses and the country.” employer companies will have to be licensed by the Border and Immigration Agency to “sponsor” Tier 2 applicant migrants they wish to employ, having first proven they cannot fill the skilled posts with resident workers. Skilled migrant workers will have to  produce a certificate of sponsorship and a job offer before they can even apply for a visa. Tier 5 is intended to cater for youth mobility and those travelling to the for primarily non-economic reasons such as voluntary work, sport and entertainment. Tier 5 migrants will need a licensed sponsor and a certificate of sponsorship showing they have the requisite number of points and have sufficient funds to maintain themselves in the . The Tier 5 scheme is intended to ensure that the number of young workers entering the country under this tier mirrors the number of nationals benefiting from reciprocal arrangements overseas. She says: “Many of our clients are reliant on immigration to fill vacancies within their workforce and will be concerned by the changes that have taken place. On the face of it, the new licensing system could be unduly bureau cratic and the shifting points system too unpredictable for employers to make long-term plans in respect of their staffing needs.” It is not yet known if the pointsbased system is flexible enough to balance the requirements of employers with the government’s desire to control the flow of foreign workers into the country, according to Black. She adds: “In the meantime, it is vitally important that employers comply with their obligations as licensed employers to avoid incurring the substantial fines and criminal sanctions that may be imposed.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll