header-logo header-logo

Government presses ahead with overhaul of immigration rules

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

News

The government has published its proposals for employing skilled and temporary migrant workers in the latest phase of its overhaul of the immigration system. The schemes—known as Tier 2 and Tier 5 of the new pointsbased system—follow a lengthy review of the ’s immigration rules and the introduction of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 this year. Natalie Black, a lawyer at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says Tier 2 aims to amalgamate some of the many ways that skilled workers can enter and work in the , including the work permit scheme. She says: “Prospective workers under this tier will have to earn a certain number of points based on their skills, standard of English and prospective salary. The threshold of points required will change depending on the requirements of businesses and the country.” employer companies will have to be licensed by the Border and Immigration Agency to “sponsor” Tier 2 applicant migrants they wish to employ, having first proven they cannot fill the skilled posts with resident workers. Skilled migrant workers will have to  produce a certificate of sponsorship and a job offer before they can even apply for a visa. Tier 5 is intended to cater for youth mobility and those travelling to the for primarily non-economic reasons such as voluntary work, sport and entertainment. Tier 5 migrants will need a licensed sponsor and a certificate of sponsorship showing they have the requisite number of points and have sufficient funds to maintain themselves in the . The Tier 5 scheme is intended to ensure that the number of young workers entering the country under this tier mirrors the number of nationals benefiting from reciprocal arrangements overseas. She says: “Many of our clients are reliant on immigration to fill vacancies within their workforce and will be concerned by the changes that have taken place. On the face of it, the new licensing system could be unduly bureau cratic and the shifting points system too unpredictable for employers to make long-term plans in respect of their staffing needs.” It is not yet known if the pointsbased system is flexible enough to balance the requirements of employers with the government’s desire to control the flow of foreign workers into the country, according to Black. She adds: “In the meantime, it is vitally important that employers comply with their obligations as licensed employers to avoid incurring the substantial fines and criminal sanctions that may be imposed.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll