header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Government presses ahead with overhaul of immigration rules

News

The government has published its proposals for employing skilled and temporary migrant workers in the latest phase of its overhaul of the immigration system. The schemes—known as Tier 2 and Tier 5 of the new pointsbased system—follow a lengthy review of the UK’s immigration rules and the introduction of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 this year. Natalie Black, a lawyer at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says Tier 2 aims to amalgamate some of the many ways that skilled workers can enter and work in the UK, including the work permit scheme. She says: “Prospective workers under this tier will have to earn a certain number of points based on their skills, standard of English and prospective salary. The threshold of points required will change depending on the requirements of businesses and the country.” UK employer companies will have to be licensed by the Border and Immigration Agency to “sponsor” Tier 2 applicant migrants they wish to employ, having first proven they cannot fill the skilled posts with resident workers. Skilled migrant workers will have to  produce a certificate of sponsorship and a job offer before they can even apply for a visa. Tier 5 is intended to cater for youth mobility and those travelling to the UK for primarily non-economic reasons such as voluntary work, sport and entertainment. Tier 5 migrants will need a licensed sponsor and a certificate of sponsorship showing they have the requisite number of points and have sufficient funds to maintain themselves in the UK. The Tier 5 scheme is intended to ensure that the number of young workers entering the country under this tier mirrors the number of UK nationals benefiting from reciprocal arrangements overseas. She says: “Many of our clients are reliant on immigration to fill vacancies within their workforce and will be concerned by the changes that have taken place. On the face of it, the new licensing system could be unduly bureau cratic and the shifting points system too unpredictable for employers to make long-term plans in respect of their staffing needs.” It is not yet known if the pointsbased system is flexible enough to balance the requirements of UK employers with the government’s desire to control the flow of foreign workers into the country, according to Black. She adds: “In the meantime, it is vitally important that employers comply with their obligations as licensed employers to avoid incurring the substantial fines and criminal sanctions that may be imposed.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll