header-logo header-logo

22 December 2017
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Government releases 39 summaries on Brexit impact

​The government has come under fire from MPs for publishing summaries of 39 sectors that will be affected by Brexit—on the last day of the Parliamentary session.

Brexit Secretary David Davis has previously said impact assessments on the key sectors of Britain’s economy had been conducted in ‘excruciating’ detail. He later backtracked, admitting in December that the assessments did not exist. He claimed that such analysis would be of little use, and declared himself ‘not a fan of economic models because they have all been proven wrong’.

However, Davis’ department released short summaries of each sector and how it interacts with the EU this week. The reports repeat Davis’ assertion, stating: ‘As the government has made clear, it is not the case that 58 sectoral impact assessments exist.’

The 39 documents include a 15-page summary of ‘professional & business services’ (including legal services) as well as similar-sized summaries of ‘real estate’, ‘retail & corporate banking’.

Pat McFadden MP, leading supporter of Open Britain, said: ‘The knots the government has tied itself in over publication of these reports says more about the state of politics and the government’s paranoid state of mind than it does about Brexit. 

‘There is little or nothing in them that couldn’t be learned from the annual reports of different trade bodies yet we were asked to believe that somehow revealing how many cars were made in Britain every year was an act of national treachery.

‘The government’s most ardent supporters on the Select Committee voted not to reveal the sections which showed the industry views of Brexit and what they hoped the outcome of the talks would be. You have to wonder what they have to fear.

“This whole saga of whether or not there were impact assessments or sectoral studies, and what the difference between them may or may not be, has revealed that breezy busking won’t cut it when people’s jobs and livelihoods are on the line.’

The reports can be found here: http://www.parliament.uk

ENDS

Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

London restructuring team strengthened by legal director appointment

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll