header-logo header-logo

Government releases 39 summaries on Brexit impact

22 December 2017
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

​The government has come under fire from MPs for publishing summaries of 39 sectors that will be affected by Brexit—on the last day of the Parliamentary session.

Brexit Secretary David Davis has previously said impact assessments on the key sectors of Britain’s economy had been conducted in ‘excruciating’ detail. He later backtracked, admitting in December that the assessments did not exist. He claimed that such analysis would be of little use, and declared himself ‘not a fan of economic models because they have all been proven wrong’.

However, Davis’ department released short summaries of each sector and how it interacts with the EU this week. The reports repeat Davis’ assertion, stating: ‘As the government has made clear, it is not the case that 58 sectoral impact assessments exist.’

The 39 documents include a 15-page summary of ‘professional & business services’ (including legal services) as well as similar-sized summaries of ‘real estate’, ‘retail & corporate banking’.

Pat McFadden MP, leading supporter of Open Britain, said: ‘The knots the government has tied itself in over publication of these reports says more about the state of politics and the government’s paranoid state of mind than it does about Brexit. 

‘There is little or nothing in them that couldn’t be learned from the annual reports of different trade bodies yet we were asked to believe that somehow revealing how many cars were made in Britain every year was an act of national treachery.

‘The government’s most ardent supporters on the Select Committee voted not to reveal the sections which showed the industry views of Brexit and what they hoped the outcome of the talks would be. You have to wonder what they have to fear.

“This whole saga of whether or not there were impact assessments or sectoral studies, and what the difference between them may or may not be, has revealed that breezy busking won’t cut it when people’s jobs and livelihoods are on the line.’

The reports can be found here: http://www.parliament.uk

ENDS

Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll