header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Government U-turn on non-dom tax

Non-domicile taxation

The government has been forced to backtrack on plans to tax foreigners domiciled in the UK after pressure from business leaders.

Dave Hartnett, HM Revenue & Customs’ acting chairman, has written to companies clarifying the government’s proposals to levy a charge of £30,000 on non-domiciled residents (nondoms) who have lived in the UK for seven years. He said that as long as non-doms declare their remittances to the UK and pay UK tax on them, they will not be required to disclose information on the source of the remittances. Money brought into the UK to pay the £30,000 charge will not itself be taxable, he said, and it will continue to be possible to bring artworks into the UK for public display without incurring a tax charge. Tax on offshore trusts would not apply retrospectively. John Cridland, deputy director general of the Confederation of British Industry, says the clarification is a victory for common sense.

“The proposals were clearly cobbled together in a hurry and went a lot further than the £30,000 headline figure, with the clauses on trusts and the retroactive aspects for taxing gains particularly punitive,” he adds.

 

Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll