header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Government U-turn on non-dom tax

Non-domicile taxation

The government has been forced to backtrack on plans to tax foreigners domiciled in the UK after pressure from business leaders.

Dave Hartnett, HM Revenue & Customs’ acting chairman, has written to companies clarifying the government’s proposals to levy a charge of £30,000 on non-domiciled residents (nondoms) who have lived in the UK for seven years. He said that as long as non-doms declare their remittances to the UK and pay UK tax on them, they will not be required to disclose information on the source of the remittances. Money brought into the UK to pay the £30,000 charge will not itself be taxable, he said, and it will continue to be possible to bring artworks into the UK for public display without incurring a tax charge. Tax on offshore trusts would not apply retrospectively. John Cridland, deputy director general of the Confederation of British Industry, says the clarification is a victory for common sense.

“The proposals were clearly cobbled together in a hurry and went a lot further than the £30,000 headline figure, with the clauses on trusts and the retroactive aspects for taxing gains particularly punitive,” he adds.

 

Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll