header-logo header-logo

Government U-turn on non-dom tax

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Non-domicile taxation

The government has been forced to backtrack on plans to tax foreigners domiciled in the UK after pressure from business leaders.

Dave Hartnett, HM Revenue & Customs’ acting chairman, has written to companies clarifying the government’s proposals to levy a charge of £30,000 on non-domiciled residents (nondoms) who have lived in the UK for seven years. He said that as long as non-doms declare their remittances to the UK and pay UK tax on them, they will not be required to disclose information on the source of the remittances. Money brought into the UK to pay the £30,000 charge will not itself be taxable, he said, and it will continue to be possible to bring artworks into the UK for public display without incurring a tax charge. Tax on offshore trusts would not apply retrospectively. John Cridland, deputy director general of the Confederation of British Industry, says the clarification is a victory for common sense.

“The proposals were clearly cobbled together in a hurry and went a lot further than the £30,000 headline figure, with the clauses on trusts and the retroactive aspects for taxing gains particularly punitive,” he adds.

 

Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll