header-logo header-logo

Government U-turn on non-dom tax

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Non-domicile taxation

The government has been forced to backtrack on plans to tax foreigners domiciled in the after pressure from business leaders.

Dave Hartnett, HM Revenue & Customs’ acting chairman, has written to companies clarifying the government’s proposals to levy a charge of £30,000 on non-domiciled residents (nondoms) who have lived in the for seven years. He said that as long as non-doms declare their remittances to the and pay tax on them, they will not be required to disclose information on the source of the remittances. Money brought into the to pay the £30,000 charge will not itself be taxable, he said, and it will continue to be possible to bring artworks into the for public display without incurring a tax charge. Tax on offshore trusts would not apply retrospectively. John Cridland, deputy director general of the Confederation of British Industry, says the clarification is a victory for common sense.

“The proposals were clearly cobbled together in a hurry and went a lot further than the £30,000 headline figure, with the clauses on trusts and the retroactive aspects for taxing gains particularly punitive,” he adds.

 

Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll