header-logo header-logo

Graduated fee U-turn

26 October 2017
Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has backed down on proposed cutbacks to graduated fees. In February, its consultation, ‘Litigators’ Graduated Fees Scheme and Court Appointees’ proposed reducing the number of prosecution pages used to calculate the graduated fee from 10,000 to 6,000 and limiting costs payable to court appointees to legal aid rates, in Crown Court cases.

Almost all of 1,005 responses opposed the proposals. A MoJ spokesperson said this week: ‘The Lord Chancellor has confirmed he will not reinstate the second fee cut for all defence litigation work that was suspended in April 2016. At the same time, we are making changes to ensure payments better reflect the actual work being done in legal aid-funded criminal proceedings.’

Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll