header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013 / Malcolm Dowden , Ruby Dalal
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Gremlins in the closet

Tenants should beware of outstanding rent reviews & any potential liability, as Ruby Dalal & Malcolm Dowden explain

Recent retail casualties, including Comet and Jessops, mean that a significant number of high street and trading park leases are likely to become available for assignment or underletting. Prospective new tenants should check carefully to ensure that attractive bargains are not overtaken by delayed rent reviews.

In Idealview Ltd v Bello [2009] EWHC 2808 (QB) a landlord was not time-barred by statute despite being almost 13 years late in implementing a rent review, and there was nothing in the rent review clause itself to make time of the essence.

Oblivious tenant comes unstuck

Mr Bello took an assignment of the lease in October 2005. The fact that the auction sale conditions excluded the seller’s liability for any rent arrears above the original rent amount did not set off any alarm bells for the tenant. In fact, the landlord had not exercised the rent review due on 25 March 1994.

In 2006,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll