header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013 / Malcolm Dowden , Ruby Dalal
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Gremlins in the closet

Tenants should beware of outstanding rent reviews & any potential liability, as Ruby Dalal & Malcolm Dowden explain

Recent retail casualties, including Comet and Jessops, mean that a significant number of high street and trading park leases are likely to become available for assignment or underletting. Prospective new tenants should check carefully to ensure that attractive bargains are not overtaken by delayed rent reviews.

In Idealview Ltd v Bello [2009] EWHC 2808 (QB) a landlord was not time-barred by statute despite being almost 13 years late in implementing a rent review, and there was nothing in the rent review clause itself to make time of the essence.

Oblivious tenant comes unstuck

Mr Bello took an assignment of the lease in October 2005. The fact that the auction sale conditions excluded the seller’s liability for any rent arrears above the original rent amount did not set off any alarm bells for the tenant. In fact, the landlord had not exercised the rent review due on 25 March 1994.

In 2006,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll