header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013 / Malcolm Dowden , Ruby Dalal
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Gremlins in the closet

Tenants should beware of outstanding rent reviews & any potential liability, as Ruby Dalal & Malcolm Dowden explain

Recent retail casualties, including Comet and Jessops, mean that a significant number of high street and trading park leases are likely to become available for assignment or underletting. Prospective new tenants should check carefully to ensure that attractive bargains are not overtaken by delayed rent reviews.

In Idealview Ltd v Bello [2009] EWHC 2808 (QB) a landlord was not time-barred by statute despite being almost 13 years late in implementing a rent review, and there was nothing in the rent review clause itself to make time of the essence.

Oblivious tenant comes unstuck

Mr Bello took an assignment of the lease in October 2005. The fact that the auction sale conditions excluded the seller’s liability for any rent arrears above the original rent amount did not set off any alarm bells for the tenant. In fact, the landlord had not exercised the rent review due on 25 March 1994.

In 2006,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll