header-logo header-logo

Grooming gangs inquiry announced

18 June 2025
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Abuse , Child law
printer mail-detail
A statutory inquiry into grooming gangs, strengthened rape laws, and mandatory reporting will be introduced, the home secretary Yvette Cooper has said

Speaking in the House of Commons this week, Cooper pledged to ‘take action… immediately’ on all 12 recommendations in Baroness Louise Casey’s National Audit on Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (grooming gangs).

The Home Office commissioned the audit to assess the nature, scale and characteristics of gang-based exploitation, including ethnicity of offenders and cultural and social drivers.

The law will be changed so adults who rape children under 16 can no longer plead consent as part of their defence, Cooper said. Abuse victims convicted of ‘child prostitution offences’ while their rapists escaped prosecution will have their convictions disregarded and criminal records expunged.

Cooper said the government will introduce mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse or exploitation, and aggravated offences of grooming, in the Crime and Policing Bill. Both were among 20 recommendations of Professor Alexis Jay’s Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, which reported in 2022.

Amy Clowrey, director and solicitor at Switalskis, who specialises in child sexual abuse compensation, said: ‘We cannot continue producing report after report with little follow-through.’

‘Survivors deserve meaningful change, not just headlines. It is also important that wraparound support is set up for survivors of abuse as both the local and national inquiries into historical abuse will be incredibly traumatising for many, as it is a topic which is closely followed by the national media.

‘I urge swift implementation of all recommendations to ensure better support for survivors and improved protection for children. Without urgent action, the cycle of harm and institutional failure will continue unchecked.’

Cooper said the police have identified for formal review more than 800 closed cases involving grooming and child sexual exploitation allegations, expected to rise to 1,000 in coming weeks.

Issue: 8121 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Abuse , Child law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll