header-logo header-logo

20 October 2011 / James O’connell
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Groundhog day

James O’Connell feels a sense of déjà vu over alternative business structures

Much has been written about the new competition solicitors will face from alternative business structures (ABSs). However, many smaller firms have been quietly facing tough competition from non-solicitor ie, paralegal, law firms (PLFs) for years now. What lessons about the likely impact of ABSs can we learn from 15 years of competition with PLFs?

Take the threat seriously

Solicitors are losing market-share to PLFs in numerous areas, eg uncontested divorces, will-writing, immigration advice, landlord repossessions, debt enforcement, and small and medium enterprise employment law advice.

Audit your “solicitor” branding

If the solicitor brand was as powerful as we’d like, then 6,500 PLFs wouldn’t have flourished over the past 15 years at the expense of solicitors, and ABS firms would not be scenting rich-pickings. These things imply that people really just want basic competency at an affordable price—and whoever it’s from is secondary.

ABSs will be regulated too, but when they get into non-reserved activity work (and they will) the chances

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll