header-logo header-logo

Groundhog Day?

13 November 2014 / Philip McCormack
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
mccormack_0

Proposals for the SRA’s compensation fund to meet uninsured firms’ negligence claims seem oddly familiar, says Philip McCormack

Midnight, 31 August 2000. Tony Blair was yet to complete his first term in 10 Downing Street. The millennium bug hangover had not fully worn off. And the legal profession was on the brink of parting ways with its Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF). As many will recall, the Solicitors Indemnity Rules stipulated that all firms make contributions to the SIF. They were to do so at varying levels, according to their turnover and claims history. In return, they were entitled to up to £1m of cover. A deficit of more than £450m, accelerated by discounted contributions failing to meet liabilities, precipitated the SIF’s demise.

Then came demutualisation and, with it, the birth of the Assigned Risks Pool (ARP). This new fund of last resort facilitated cover for firms which were unable to obtain it on the open market, and provided run-off cover for those firms whose insurers had gone insolvent. The open market initially provided a seemingly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll