header-logo header-logo

13 November 2014 / Philip McCormack
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Groundhog Day?

mccormack_0

Proposals for the SRA’s compensation fund to meet uninsured firms’ negligence claims seem oddly familiar, says Philip McCormack

Midnight, 31 August 2000. Tony Blair was yet to complete his first term in 10 Downing Street. The millennium bug hangover had not fully worn off. And the legal profession was on the brink of parting ways with its Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF). As many will recall, the Solicitors Indemnity Rules stipulated that all firms make contributions to the SIF. They were to do so at varying levels, according to their turnover and claims history. In return, they were entitled to up to £1m of cover. A deficit of more than £450m, accelerated by discounted contributions failing to meet liabilities, precipitated the SIF’s demise.

Then came demutualisation and, with it, the birth of the Assigned Risks Pool (ARP). This new fund of last resort facilitated cover for firms which were unable to obtain it on the open market, and provided run-off cover for those firms whose insurers had gone insolvent. The open market initially provided a seemingly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll