header-logo header-logo

29 June 2012
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Guarantees

Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd and another company v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA [2012] EWHC 1715 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 142 (Jun)

The obligation of a guarantor was to be responsible for the contractual performance due by another person to a third. The commercial purpose of a guarantee was to ensure that the creditor was paid the debt owed to him by the debtor who was being guaranteed. English law afforded a guarantor under a guarantee of the classic type a considerable degree of legal protection. The essential characteristic of a guarantee was that the liability of the guarantor was a secondary one. It was the debtor who was primarily liable to pay. If therefore, the debtor had no liability, the guarantor had none either. The guarantor might avail himself of all the defences available to the debtor in respect of the payment sought. It was established practice to have payment guarantees that were not guarantees, properly so called, but instruments—often called demand bonds or performance bonds—by which a bank or similar institution promised to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll