header-logo header-logo

17 September 2015
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Halsbury Legal Awards: the winners

Legal excellence is once again celebrated at the annual awards ceremony

Former Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC MP, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism David Anderson QC, and future guru Professor Richard Susskind were the 2015 headline winners of this year’s Halsbury Legal Awards, held in association with NLJ.

The awards, presented by comic Miles Jupp at a gala celebration in London this week, celebrate excellence in the law across the entire legal profession.

Dominic Grieve received the Rule of Law Award in recognition of his support for human rights and commitment to principle above party politics.

As Legal Personality of the Year, David Anderson was commended for his independence and headline-making reports in a notoriously difficult area, while Richard Susskind picked up the Future of Law Award for his ability to tap into the profession’s zeitgeist. Professor Michael Zander QC was also applauded for his lifetime contribution.

Speaking at the awards, Christian Fleck, managing director for LexisNexis UK & Ireland, said: “The Halsbury Legal Awards are designed to champion the truly exceptional across all sections of the legal profession.

“We’re here not only to applaud the record-breaking achievements and commercial successes of the legal industry, but also to celebrate the spirit of Halsbury—the whole of the law and the legal community connected—encapsulated so well by tonight’s winners.”

Serjeants’ Inn Chambers and Ropewalk Chambers scooped the London and Regional Chambers of the Year Awards respectively, while the award for Law Firm of the Year (more than 50 employees) went to Brachers, and Crossland Employment Solicitors scooped Law Firm of the Year (fewer than 50 employees).

The Innovation Award went to the National Archives for its revolutionary approach to managing and organising legislation while Just for Kids Law was honoured for its commitment to children in crisis.

Emeritus Professor Andrew Ashworth QC was distinguished for his superlative Academic Contribution.

The full list of winners can be found here.

Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll