header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021 / Shabina Begum , Marisa Razeek
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Halt the hijab hijack

50376
Global rhetoric has commandeered the hijab for political power plays: the choice of what to wear should be for each woman to decide for herself, say Shabina Begum & Marisa Razeek

Throughout history, we have witnessed people in power politicising religion. In more recent times, the societal pressure placed on Muslim women, often formed by the cultural patriarchy, is immense. And it seems that the easiest and most visible way to do so, is to dictate a woman’s hijab, or her covering.

In a number of majority-Muslim countries, a woman is either legislated, regulated, or compelled socially to wear the hijab. In an increasing number of countries where Muslims are in the minority, Muslim women are restricted or prohibited from wearing the hijab in certain spaces, and may be excluded from assistance or access to basic necessities if they still choose to wear their hijab. Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly, these rules mainly adversely impact Muslim women. These rules either would restrict or prevent them from accessing education, employment,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll