header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021 / Shabina Begum , Marisa Razeek
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Halt the hijab hijack

50376
Global rhetoric has commandeered the hijab for political power plays: the choice of what to wear should be for each woman to decide for herself, say Shabina Begum & Marisa Razeek

Throughout history, we have witnessed people in power politicising religion. In more recent times, the societal pressure placed on Muslim women, often formed by the cultural patriarchy, is immense. And it seems that the easiest and most visible way to do so, is to dictate a woman’s hijab, or her covering.

In a number of majority-Muslim countries, a woman is either legislated, regulated, or compelled socially to wear the hijab. In an increasing number of countries where Muslims are in the minority, Muslim women are restricted or prohibited from wearing the hijab in certain spaces, and may be excluded from assistance or access to basic necessities if they still choose to wear their hijab. Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly, these rules mainly adversely impact Muslim women. These rules either would restrict or prevent them from accessing education, employment,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll