header-logo header-logo

Halt the hijab hijack

02 June 2021 / Shabina Begum , Marisa Razeek
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail
50376
Global rhetoric has commandeered the hijab for political power plays: the choice of what to wear should be for each woman to decide for herself, say Shabina Begum & Marisa Razeek

Throughout history, we have witnessed people in power politicising religion. In more recent times, the societal pressure placed on Muslim women, often formed by the cultural patriarchy, is immense. And it seems that the easiest and most visible way to do so, is to dictate a woman’s hijab, or her covering.

In a number of majority-Muslim countries, a woman is either legislated, regulated, or compelled socially to wear the hijab. In an increasing number of countries where Muslims are in the minority, Muslim women are restricted or prohibited from wearing the hijab in certain spaces, and may be excluded from assistance or access to basic necessities if they still choose to wear their hijab. Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly, these rules mainly adversely impact Muslim women. These rules either would restrict or prevent them from accessing education, employment,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll