header-logo header-logo

Handle with care: court reform

05 April 2018
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail
andrew_walker_for_chairs_column_site_1

The Bar is not set against the government’s court reform programme, the Chair of the Bar Council, Andrew Walker QC (pictured) writes in NLJ this week. However, it does have reservations, for example, about the ‘lack of proper consultation’ and ‘lack of clarity of aims’. Walker says: ‘We should not be spending first and asking questions later.’

Walker highlights the importance of spending money ‘wisely, and on the right things’ as savings will depend on having good quality courts, IT infrastructure and judges in place. He notes that access to justice will still depend on access to the services of a cohort of dedicated lawyers.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll