header-logo header-logo

Handle with care: court reform

05 April 2018
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail
andrew_walker_for_chairs_column_site_1

The Bar is not set against the government’s court reform programme, the Chair of the Bar Council, Andrew Walker QC (pictured) writes in NLJ this week. However, it does have reservations, for example, about the ‘lack of proper consultation’ and ‘lack of clarity of aims’. Walker says: ‘We should not be spending first and asking questions later.’

Walker highlights the importance of spending money ‘wisely, and on the right things’ as savings will depend on having good quality courts, IT infrastructure and judges in place. He notes that access to justice will still depend on access to the services of a cohort of dedicated lawyers.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll