header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Heather Platt
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , Personal injury , Limitation
printer mail-detail

Handle with kid gloves

gettyimages_112062879_4

Heather Platt examines the law in relation to children who sue their parents

IN BRIEF

  • The provisions of the Limitation Act 1980 lead to peculiar and unjust outcomes for claimants maltreated during their early years.
  • Claimants are advised to plead both negligence and trespass.

The law of tort is primarily concerned with providing a remedy to those who have been harmed by the conduct of others. This article considers the law in respect of parents’ legal obligations towards their children and some examples of cases which involve a child suing his or her parents for causing physical or psychological harm.

The case law in the UK has developed under the umbrellas of negligence and trespass to the person. However, one of the problems faced by claimants, particularly those who were abused as children, is the limitation regime which can operate in an arbitrary way causing irrational and unjust outcomes.

The limitation hurdle

The statutory basis for the limitation is the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980). It provides

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll