header-logo header-logo

Hands off!

Employers must be proactive in stopping third-party sexual harassment to employees, or risk discrimination claims. Richard Nicolle explains

Since 6 April 2008, employers may be vulnerable to damages claims from their employees if they knowingly fail to protect them from repeated sexual harassment by a third party. If customers or clients harass staff, they can sue their boss.

The Employment Equality (Sex Discrimination) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/2467) (2005 Regulations) amended the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) to implement the European Equal Treatment Amendment Directive (the Directive) which expressly prohibited sexual harassment. However, in 2007 the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) mounted a successful challenge to the 2005 Regulations in the High Court (Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] EWHC 483 (Admin), [2007] IRLR 327).

The court found that the 2005 Regulations did not adequately provide the protections required by the Directive or reflect the government's interpretation of the domestic provisions as set out in their own guidance. The court's decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll