header-logo header-logo

Hands off!

Employers must be proactive in stopping third-party sexual harassment to employees, or risk discrimination claims. Richard Nicolle explains

Since 6 April 2008, employers may be vulnerable to damages claims from their employees if they knowingly fail to protect them from repeated sexual harassment by a third party. If customers or clients harass staff, they can sue their boss.

The Employment Equality (Sex Discrimination) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/2467) (2005 Regulations) amended the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) to implement the European Equal Treatment Amendment Directive (the Directive) which expressly prohibited sexual harassment. However, in 2007 the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) mounted a successful challenge to the 2005 Regulations in the High Court (Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] EWHC 483 (Admin), [2007] IRLR 327).

The court found that the 2005 Regulations did not adequately provide the protections required by the Directive or reflect the government's interpretation of the domestic provisions as set out in their own guidance. The court's decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll