header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 November 2009 / Veronica Bailey
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Profession , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Happy anniversary

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Veronica Bailey looks at advances in domain name disputes—10 years on

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) held a conference in Geneva to mark the 10th anniversary of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedure (UDRP) last month.

The UDRP was designed to address cyber-squatting, providing trade mark and service mark owners with a mechanism for the resolution of disputes over domain names.

The complainant under the UDRP has to establish: that the disputed domain is identical or confusingly similar to the trade mark or service mark in which he has rights; that the registrant of the domain name has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name; and that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

The first case filed, World Wrestling v Bosman (D99-0001), involved straightforward cybersquatting. Since then WIPO has administered over 16,000 cases filed under the UDRP.

Today, there are over 180m domain name registrations and their use has changed significantly. Domain names are now not only used by owners of trade marks or service

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll