header-logo header-logo

Happy anniversary

05 November 2009 / Veronica Bailey
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Profession , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Veronica Bailey looks at advances in domain name disputes—10 years on

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) held a conference in Geneva to mark the 10th anniversary of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedure (UDRP) last month.

The UDRP was designed to address cyber-squatting, providing trade mark and service mark owners with a mechanism for the resolution of disputes over domain names.

The complainant under the UDRP has to establish: that the disputed domain is identical or confusingly similar to the trade mark or service mark in which he has rights; that the registrant of the domain name has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name; and that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

The first case filed, World Wrestling v Bosman (D99-0001), involved straightforward cybersquatting. Since then WIPO has administered over 16,000 cases filed under the UDRP.

Today, there are over 180m domain name registrations and their use has changed significantly. Domain names are now not only used by owners of trade marks or service

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll