header-logo header-logo

27 February 2015 / Tim Parker , Tim Parker
Issue: 7642 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Happy anniversary?

Almost a year on from major reform, Tim Parker assesses the family justice system

Almost a year has passed since the introduction of what Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, described as “the largest reform of the family justice system any of us have seen or will see in our professional lifetimes” (View from the President’s Chambers, no. 11). Although he was also quick to point out that he didn’t accept that the new rules concerning expert instructions and the 26 week limit would “prejudice the quality of justice or the interests of those who appear before us”. So as the first anniversary of the changes nears, how has the system fared?

The illness

The architects of the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) expected that care applications would last no more than 12 weeks, with most being concluded within eight. It is unclear whether these timescales were ever realistic; what is clear is that the length of applications increased over the years. Within five years of the Act coming into

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll