header-logo header-logo

13 August 2009 / Sean Curley
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Hard to beat

The old saying that hard cases make bad law is one is not always true is a recent case in the Privy Council demonstrates in a laudable effort to do justice to a litigant in person the Privy Council (Lords Mance and Neuberger and Sir Jonathan Parker) appear to have extended the application of res ipsa loquitor.

This has been done without any detailed analysis or application of the facts of the case to the law in question which in the long run may undo their effort. The case is George v Eagle Air Services Limited [2009] UKPC 21, [2009] All ER (D) 33 (Aug) on appeal from The Court of Appeal of The Eastern Caribbean (St Lucia).

Mrs George was claiming as Administratrix of the estate of her late partner Hughes Williams. Mr Williams was a mechanic working for the respondents and was a passenger in one of the respondent’s aircraft that crashed killing both him and the pilot.

The accident occurred on 12 July 1990 and the crash was investigated by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll