header-logo header-logo

Hardly a moot point

01 April 2010 / Rebecca Huxley-binns
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Rebecca Huxley-Binns explains the importance of mooting

One of the aims of higher legal education is to produce independent, autonomous learners who solve problems and communicate the solution clearly and fluently. Mooting is a single assessment which enables students to achieve that aim. A moot is a mock appeal on a point of law where students are given a factual scenario and the history to the court decisions in the case, plus a ground of appeal on which they have to make written submissions and give oral presentations, as if they were counsel in the appellate court.

Mooting is commonly misunderstood; many observers think it is only the oral presentation that is the “moot” and fail to consider the work required to produce the presentation. In that way, mooting is an iceberg; it has hidden depths. The research, thinking, selection and de-selection of material that underlies the moot are not obvious to the casual observer, but are vital to the assessment. Future employers may benefit from an understanding of the criteria used

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll