header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Rebecca Huxley-binns
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Hardly a moot point

Rebecca Huxley-Binns explains the importance of mooting

One of the aims of higher legal education is to produce independent, autonomous learners who solve problems and communicate the solution clearly and fluently. Mooting is a single assessment which enables students to achieve that aim. A moot is a mock appeal on a point of law where students are given a factual scenario and the history to the court decisions in the case, plus a ground of appeal on which they have to make written submissions and give oral presentations, as if they were counsel in the appellate court.

Mooting is commonly misunderstood; many observers think it is only the oral presentation that is the “moot” and fail to consider the work required to produce the presentation. In that way, mooting is an iceberg; it has hidden depths. The research, thinking, selection and de-selection of material that underlies the moot are not obvious to the casual observer, but are vital to the assessment. Future employers may benefit from an understanding of the criteria used

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll