header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Rebecca Huxley-binns
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Hardly a moot point

Rebecca Huxley-Binns explains the importance of mooting

One of the aims of higher legal education is to produce independent, autonomous learners who solve problems and communicate the solution clearly and fluently. Mooting is a single assessment which enables students to achieve that aim. A moot is a mock appeal on a point of law where students are given a factual scenario and the history to the court decisions in the case, plus a ground of appeal on which they have to make written submissions and give oral presentations, as if they were counsel in the appellate court.

Mooting is commonly misunderstood; many observers think it is only the oral presentation that is the “moot” and fail to consider the work required to produce the presentation. In that way, mooting is an iceberg; it has hidden depths. The research, thinking, selection and de-selection of material that underlies the moot are not obvious to the casual observer, but are vital to the assessment. Future employers may benefit from an understanding of the criteria used

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll