header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Rebecca Huxley-binns
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Hardly a moot point

Rebecca Huxley-Binns explains the importance of mooting

One of the aims of higher legal education is to produce independent, autonomous learners who solve problems and communicate the solution clearly and fluently. Mooting is a single assessment which enables students to achieve that aim. A moot is a mock appeal on a point of law where students are given a factual scenario and the history to the court decisions in the case, plus a ground of appeal on which they have to make written submissions and give oral presentations, as if they were counsel in the appellate court.

Mooting is commonly misunderstood; many observers think it is only the oral presentation that is the “moot” and fail to consider the work required to produce the presentation. In that way, mooting is an iceberg; it has hidden depths. The research, thinking, selection and de-selection of material that underlies the moot are not obvious to the casual observer, but are vital to the assessment. Future employers may benefit from an understanding of the criteria used

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll