header-logo header-logo

Harmful viewing

01 February 2007 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Julian Samiloff discusses proposals to criminalise the possession of violent and extreme pornography online

The government proposes to strengthen laws against depictions of extreme sexual violence on the internet. Though already illegal to publish such material, it is legal to view. The initiative follows the tragic and horrific murder of Jane Longhurst and the public campaign based on the fact that her murderer was obsessed with images of sexual violence—the concern being that viewing such images causes extreme behaviour.

The publication offence

The Obscene Publications Acts 1959 (OPA 1959) and 1964 (OPA 1964) currently apply to internet content. However, under OPA 1959, s 1(3) an offence can only be committed by the publisher of the offending material eg image makers, website owners and hosting internet services providers (ISPs). OPA 1959, s 1(3) defines publication, for data stored electronically, as transmission of the material.

In R v Perrin [2002] EWCA Crim 747, [2002] All ER (D) 359 (Mar), applying R v Waddon, 6th April 2000, unreported, the defendant, a foreign national, was successfully prosecuted, on entering the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll