header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Harmful viewing

Julian Samiloff discusses proposals to criminalise the possession of violent and extreme pornography online

The government proposes to strengthen laws against depictions of extreme sexual violence on the internet. Though already illegal to publish such material, it is legal to view. The initiative follows the tragic and horrific murder of Jane Longhurst and the public campaign based on the fact that her murderer was obsessed with images of sexual violence—the concern being that viewing such images causes extreme behaviour.

The publication offence

The Obscene Publications Acts 1959 (OPA 1959) and 1964 (OPA 1964) currently apply to internet content. However, under OPA 1959, s 1(3) an offence can only be committed by the publisher of the offending material eg image makers, website owners and hosting internet services providers (ISPs). OPA 1959, s 1(3) defines publication, for data stored electronically, as transmission of the material.

In R v Perrin [2002] EWCA Crim 747, [2002] All ER (D) 359 (Mar), applying R v Waddon, 6th April 2000, unreported, the defendant, a foreign national, was successfully prosecuted, on entering the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll