header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Harmful viewing

Julian Samiloff discusses proposals to criminalise the possession of violent and extreme pornography online

The government proposes to strengthen laws against depictions of extreme sexual violence on the internet. Though already illegal to publish such material, it is legal to view. The initiative follows the tragic and horrific murder of Jane Longhurst and the public campaign based on the fact that her murderer was obsessed with images of sexual violence—the concern being that viewing such images causes extreme behaviour.

The publication offence

The Obscene Publications Acts 1959 (OPA 1959) and 1964 (OPA 1964) currently apply to internet content. However, under OPA 1959, s 1(3) an offence can only be committed by the publisher of the offending material eg image makers, website owners and hosting internet services providers (ISPs). OPA 1959, s 1(3) defines publication, for data stored electronically, as transmission of the material.

In R v Perrin [2002] EWCA Crim 747, [2002] All ER (D) 359 (Mar), applying R v Waddon, 6th April 2000, unreported, the defendant, a foreign national, was successfully prosecuted, on entering the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll