header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7258

01 February 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

Marianne Butler reviews the airlines’ defence to rebut compensation claims for cancelled flights

Tess Gill considers the effects of recent rulings
on call-out time in the working week

Can legislation keep pace with technological developments? asks Stefan Fafinski

Fourie v Le Roux and others
[2007] UKHL 1, [2007] All ER (D) 171 (Jan)

RESIDENCE: THE LATEST APPROACH

Julian Samiloff discusses proposals to criminalise the possession of violent and extreme pornography online

Negligence has changed since Donoghue v Stevenson—and not for the better, argues Jon Holbrook

The Insider deplores Channel 4’s ratings-motivated exploitation of heinous housemates

The slippery concept of the rule of law is still worth fighting for, says Roger Smith

EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES IN FAMILY PROCEEDINGS

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll