header-logo header-logo

06 May 2026
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Human rights , Equality
printer mail-detail

Hate crimes fast-tracked by CPS

Prosecutors will speed up preparations for charging hate crimes, under Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) guidance issued in response to the surge in antisemitic incidents

Under the updated CPS policy, issued this week, prosecutors will focus on gathering core evidence required to prove the case, making faster charging decisions where the evidential threshold is met even if some supporting evidence can be obtained later. Where appropriate, prosecutors will be able to make a decision whether or not to proceed based on a reliable victim’s account as well as description or photographs of injuries, or medical records.

The CPS is reducing its pre-charge disclosure requirements in hate crime cases. The guidance notes that ‘a charging decision should only be deferred if there is a reasonable line of inquiry which must be followed because it goes to the heart of whether the case can be charged or not’. It states there is a strong public interest in prosecution and ‘accordingly the expectation will be that a prosecution will follow where the evidential test is satisfied’.

Fear has escalated in the Jewish community following a spate of attacks including the stabbings in Golders Green last week, the attacks on the Hatzola ambulance service in March and the terror attacks at the Heaton Park synagogue in Manchester last October, where two Jewish men were killed.

Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Parkinson said those arrested and charged for crimes against the Jewish community would be dealt with ‘as quickly as possible.

‘But it is also clear that there are daily threats or abuse which are designed to harass and distress Jewish people. These too are criminal offences and they are contributing to a climate of fear felt by the Jewish community.

‘I want to make it clear that if you are threatening or abusive towards someone and you intend to distress or are likely to cause distress then that is an offence. If your actions are motivated by religious or racial hatred then additional penalties apply.’

The CPS prosecuted 658 religious hate crimes and 11,140 defendants for racial hate crimes in the year to September 2025.

Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Human rights , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll