header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

He, she, yo!

Roderick Ramage wonders whether lawyers should take the lead in promoting a new gender-neutral pronoun

Have the pupils at middle school and high school in Baltimore solved our linguistic dilemma? What does this sentence, in the rule book of a care home, mean?

“Where a complainant notifies the other residents of a complaint, they must lodge a section 12 notice within 14 days.”
 
You can tell that it was written by a sociologist or social worker because of the politically correct “they”. A journalist would be just as likely to have used “they” instead of thinking what he or she means to say, but is unlikely to have been commissioned to write a care home rule book. According to the New Scientist: “The lack of a gender neutral personal pronoun in English has bothered people for at least two centuries.” A strict grammarian, parsing that sentence, would have no difficulty in ascertaining what it says. The operative words are “they must lodge a…notice”, the word “they” is plural and, as
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll