header-logo header-logo

He, she, yo!

14 February 2008 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Roderick Ramage wonders whether lawyers should take the lead in promoting a new gender-neutral pronoun

Have the pupils at middle school and high school in Baltimore solved our linguistic dilemma? What does this sentence, in the rule book of a care home, mean?

“Where a complainant notifies the other residents of a complaint, they must lodge a section 12 notice within 14 days.”
 
You can tell that it was written by a sociologist or social worker because of the politically correct “they”. A journalist would be just as likely to have used “they” instead of thinking what he or she means to say, but is unlikely to have been commissioned to write a care home rule book. According to the New Scientist: “The lack of a gender neutral personal pronoun in English has bothered people for at least two centuries.” A strict grammarian, parsing that sentence, would have no difficulty in ascertaining what it says. The operative words are “they must lodge a…notice”, the word “they” is plural and, as the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll