header-logo header-logo

24 June 2010
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Health

R (on the application of Mwanza) v Greenwich London Borough Council and another [2010] EWHC 1462 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 124 (Jun)

The duty to provide accommodation under s 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948 was conditional upon the applicant being in need of “care and attention which [was] not otherwise available to them”. It was settled law that “care and attention” meant more than “accommodation”, the natural and ordinary meaning of those words being “looked after”, which meant “doing something for the person being cared for which he [could not] or should not be expected to do for himself”; medical care being expressly excluded by the section.

It was also settled that the threshold for “care and attention” was relatively low, but it was essentially a matter for the relevant local authority to assess. As with decisions made under s 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983), in relation to decisions under s 21, the courts (on a judicial review) had to give considerable respect to the professional judgment of the local authority in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll