header-logo header-logo

01 July 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Here it comes!

Dominic Regan dissects a turgid Bill to discover the essence of Jackson

By the time that you read this the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill will already have had its second reading in the House of Commons. The indecent haste is explained by money. As a perpetual defendant in all sorts of costs bearing claims, the state will find itself better off as a result of changing the costs rules. The ponderous title gives no clue to the profound changes to civil procedure contained within.

The essence of Jackson is found in cl 41 to 44 with Pt 36 reform lurking under
cl 51. What precisely is coming?

Clause 41 ends the recoverability of success fees and places a cap on the amount the legal representative can recoup from the damages recovered from his own client, who now becomes liable to pay the uplift. The measure will also limit the categories of damages from which the deduction can be made. Sir Rupert

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll