header-logo header-logo

30 October 2014 / Clare Harrington , Daniel Hobbs
Issue: 7628 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The hidden costs

harringtonhobbs

What is the true price of defending an employment tribunal claim? Clare Harrington & Daniel Hobbs report

Since the introduction of fees in the employment tribunal and the consequent reduction in claims, it might be thought that it is the employer who now comfortably has the upper hand in this jurisdiction. In the majority of claims, the claimant is now required to comply with the requirements of early conciliation and he must pay a fee to issue his claim or navigate the application process for remission. The necessity to pay fees (in circumstances where remission is unavailable) does not stop, of course, with the issue of the claim, with further payments required to progress to a final hearing. These elements of the process have surely strengthened the tactical position of many employers. To a great extent, an employer may sit back and see whether the claimant will indeed issue a claim and actually “put his money where his mouth is”.

Recoverability of costs

However, what this approach fails to acknowledge is the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—four appointments

Birketts—four appointments

Firm expands partnership with four lateral hires across key practice areas

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Commercial law firm announces appointment of corporate partner

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joins corporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

NEWS
Serial sperm donor Robert Albon has lost his bid for a declaration of paternity, ‘on the ground that to grant it would manifestly be contrary to public policy’
The government is considering wholesale reform of consumer class actions—the ‘opt-out’ collective claims certified by the Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT)
A ‘sophisticated suspected fraud’ may have taken place at PM Law involving the improper removal and misuse of about £39.5m of client funds, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) will invest in technology to catch tech-reliant fraudsters and handle voluminous case materials
Law firms enjoyed rapid growth in 2025, according to a Financial Benchmarking Survey, published by the Law Society last week
back-to-top-scroll