header-logo header-logo

High Court—Inherent Jurisdiction—Vulnerable adults

04 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

A Local Authority and others v DL [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2012] All ER (D) 211 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Maurice Kay, McFarlane and Davis LJJ, 28 Mar 2012

The High Court has inherent jurisdiction to handle cases which involve vulnerable adults in circumstances where the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is not engaged.  
 
Paul Bowen and Alison Pickup for the authority. Nathalie Lieven QC and Alex Durance for the defendant.
 
M and G were an elderly married couple. Their son, the defendant, lived with them at the home which was owned by G. The claimant local authority was concerned about the defendant's conduct towards his parents, which, it contended, had been aggressive and had resulted in physical violence. It further alleged that the defendant had controlled who could visit his parents and the terms upon which they might visit, including visits by health and social care professionals who provided care and support to M. It had also received reports that the defendant had tried to coerce
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll