header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Yvonne Simons , Alan Simons
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

High stakes

Applications for relief are best avoided, argue Yvonne Simons and Alan Simons

The court’s power to include a sanction on default in an order is long established and is preserved as part of the court’s management powers by CPR 3.1(3), which provides that when the court makes an order, it may “specify the consequences of failure to comply with the order or a condition”.
Such an order is known as an “unless order” and most frequently appears as part of an order to enforce disclosure or the provision of particulars; the sanction for non-compliance is almost invariably that a statement of case be struck out or that the claim or counterclaim be dismissed.

CASE MANAGEMENT ARMOUR

It has been recently described as “one of the most powerful weapons in the court’s case management armoury and one that should not be deployed unless its consequences can be justified” by Lord Justice Moore-Bick in Marcan Shipping (London) Ltd v Kefalas [2007] EWCA Civ 463, [2007] 3 All ER 365.

The danger presented by such an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll