header-logo header-logo

High stakes

18 March 2010 / Adam Chapman , Andreas White
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

When can employees expect to benefit from legal representation? Adam Chapman & Andreas White report

As is widely known, employees who reasonably request accompaniment at a disciplinary hearing have a statutory right to be accompanied by a colleague or trade union representative (Employment Relations Act 1999, s 10). While in serious cases employees often request legal representation at disciplinary hearings, such requests are rarely granted. In light of recent Court of Appeal authority (R (on the application of G) v X School and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1), employers will need to consider this issue more carefully. In some cases of sufficient gravity, employees will have a legal right to legal representation at disciplinary hearings. 

G was a teaching assistant employed at X school when a complaint of sexual misconduct was made against him. The governors of the school carried out an internal investigation and conducted a disciplinary hearing, following which G was dismissed for abuse of trust. G was not permitted legal representation at the hearing. He appealed, and requested legal representation at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Insolvency and restructuring practice welcomes new partner

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll