header-logo header-logo

26 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Highways

R (on the application of Maroudas) v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280, [2010] All ER (D) 171 (Mar)

For purposes of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, s 67(3) an application had to strictly comply with para 1 of Sch 14 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. However, that did not mean that a valid application had to be contained in a single document. Minor departures from the requirements of para 1 did not invalidate an application. There were circumstances in which a valid application could be contained in the application form when read with another document.

For example, a valid application could be made where supplementary information was provided to make good an error or omission in the application, at any rate if the information was provided within a very short time of the submission of the application form. It was not necessary to define the limits of permissible departures from the strict requirements Sch 14, para 1.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
back-to-top-scroll