header-logo header-logo

13 May 2010 / Oliver Gayner , Hugh Tomlinson KC
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Hilary Term 2010

Hugh Tomlinson QC & Oliver Gayner assess the Supreme Court’s Hilary Term

In Hilary Term 2010, the Supreme Court heard fourteen appeals and gave fourteen judgments. But the biggest news story concerned events—or rather non-events—outside the court room. The Supreme Court began and ended its second term of operation with eleven justices. The mysterious “twelfth justice”, who originally appeared on the court’s lists as “Justice X” failed to appear, being replaced at the last minute in each of the cases. It was not until a week before the end of term, on 23 March, that Downing Street announced the appointment of Sir John Dyson as “Justice 12”. This announcement came exactly eight months after the announcement that Lord Neuberger was to be appointed as Master of the rolls.

There has been a good deal of speculation as to why the process took so long, and what was going on behind the scenes. Attempts have been made to identify all kinds of skulduggery and back stairs jockeying for position. None of these have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll