header-logo header-logo

Hilary Term 2010

13 May 2010 / Oliver Gayner , Hugh Tomlinson KC
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Hugh Tomlinson QC & Oliver Gayner assess the Supreme Court’s Hilary Term

In Hilary Term 2010, the Supreme Court heard fourteen appeals and gave fourteen judgments. But the biggest news story concerned events—or rather non-events—outside the court room. The Supreme Court began and ended its second term of operation with eleven justices. The mysterious “twelfth justice”, who originally appeared on the court’s lists as “Justice X” failed to appear, being replaced at the last minute in each of the cases. It was not until a week before the end of term, on 23 March, that Downing Street announced the appointment of Sir John Dyson as “Justice 12”. This announcement came exactly eight months after the announcement that Lord Neuberger was to be appointed as Master of the rolls.

There has been a good deal of speculation as to why the process took so long, and what was going on behind the scenes. Attempts have been made to identify all kinds of skulduggery and back stairs jockeying for position. None of these have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll