header-logo header-logo

17 September 2025
Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail

Hillsborough Law will force officials to tell the truth

The long-awaited Hillsborough Law—creating a legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials—has been introduced in Parliament

The Public Office (Accountability) Bill is also known as the Hillsborough Law, in memory of the 97 Liverpool FC fans who died at Hillsborough Stadium in 1989, and whose families spent decades fighting for justice amid cover-ups and blame-shifting.

The Bill, drafted by Elkan Abrahamson, director at Broudie Jackson Canter, and Pete Weatherby KC, Garden Court North Chambers, was first presented to Parliament in 2017 but dropped due to the general election.

Abrahamson said the Bill’s introduction this week is ‘a momentous step’ that ‘will transform the face of British justice’.

It requires public bodies, including the police, to proactively cooperate with investigations and inquiries or face criminal penalties for non-compliance.

Bereaved families will be given access to non-means-tested legal aid at all inquests where a public body is involved, with the costs covered by the public body represented. Public bodies will be under a legal duty to ensure their spend is proportionate, stopping public bodies from hiring unjustifiably large legal teams at inquests.

The Bill also creates an offence of misleading the public in a seriously improper way, with criminal sanctions for the most egregious breaches.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer KC said: ‘Make no mistake—this a law for the 97, but it is also a law for the sub-postmasters who suffered because of the Horizon scandal, the victims of infected blood, and those who died in the terrible Grenfell Tower fire.’

Deborah Coles, director at INQUEST and Hillsborough Law Now, said the Bill was ‘a landmark step.

‘We have witnessed decades of institutional defensiveness and cruelty designed to evade scrutiny and accountability. We must now ensure the Hillsborough Law is delivered in full and those with vested interests to oppose it are resisted.’

It was not until 2016 that the Hillsborough inquests ruled the 97 were unlawfully killed—families campaigned to have the case reopened after a first inquest concluded ‘accidental death’ in 1991. Lord Justice Taylor’s inquiry, in 1990, concluded policing ‘broke down’. In 2012, the Hillsborough Independent Panel found police altered witness statements and tried to smear the victims. 

Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll