header-logo header-logo

Hillsborough Law will force officials to tell the truth

17 September 2025
Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail
The long-awaited Hillsborough Law—creating a legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials—has been introduced in Parliament

The Public Office (Accountability) Bill is also known as the Hillsborough Law, in memory of the 97 Liverpool FC fans who died at Hillsborough Stadium in 1989, and whose families spent decades fighting for justice amid cover-ups and blame-shifting.

The Bill, drafted by Elkan Abrahamson, director at Broudie Jackson Canter, and Pete Weatherby KC, Garden Court North Chambers, was first presented to Parliament in 2017 but dropped due to the general election.

Abrahamson said the Bill’s introduction this week is ‘a momentous step’ that ‘will transform the face of British justice’.

It requires public bodies, including the police, to proactively cooperate with investigations and inquiries or face criminal penalties for non-compliance.

Bereaved families will be given access to non-means-tested legal aid at all inquests where a public body is involved, with the costs covered by the public body represented. Public bodies will be under a legal duty to ensure their spend is proportionate, stopping public bodies from hiring unjustifiably large legal teams at inquests.

The Bill also creates an offence of misleading the public in a seriously improper way, with criminal sanctions for the most egregious breaches.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer KC said: ‘Make no mistake—this a law for the 97, but it is also a law for the sub-postmasters who suffered because of the Horizon scandal, the victims of infected blood, and those who died in the terrible Grenfell Tower fire.’

Deborah Coles, director at INQUEST and Hillsborough Law Now, said the Bill was ‘a landmark step.

‘We have witnessed decades of institutional defensiveness and cruelty designed to evade scrutiny and accountability. We must now ensure the Hillsborough Law is delivered in full and those with vested interests to oppose it are resisted.’

It was not until 2016 that the Hillsborough inquests ruled the 97 were unlawfully killed—families campaigned to have the case reopened after a first inquest concluded ‘accidental death’ in 1991. Lord Justice Taylor’s inquiry, in 1990, concluded policing ‘broke down’. In 2012, the Hillsborough Independent Panel found police altered witness statements and tried to smear the victims. 

Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll