header-logo header-logo

Hillsborough Law will force officials to tell the truth

17 September 2025
Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail
The long-awaited Hillsborough Law—creating a legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials—has been introduced in Parliament

The Public Office (Accountability) Bill is also known as the Hillsborough Law, in memory of the 97 Liverpool FC fans who died at Hillsborough Stadium in 1989, and whose families spent decades fighting for justice amid cover-ups and blame-shifting.

The Bill, drafted by Elkan Abrahamson, director at Broudie Jackson Canter, and Pete Weatherby KC, Garden Court North Chambers, was first presented to Parliament in 2017 but dropped due to the general election.

Abrahamson said the Bill’s introduction this week is ‘a momentous step’ that ‘will transform the face of British justice’.

It requires public bodies, including the police, to proactively cooperate with investigations and inquiries or face criminal penalties for non-compliance.

Bereaved families will be given access to non-means-tested legal aid at all inquests where a public body is involved, with the costs covered by the public body represented. Public bodies will be under a legal duty to ensure their spend is proportionate, stopping public bodies from hiring unjustifiably large legal teams at inquests.

The Bill also creates an offence of misleading the public in a seriously improper way, with criminal sanctions for the most egregious breaches.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer KC said: ‘Make no mistake—this a law for the 97, but it is also a law for the sub-postmasters who suffered because of the Horizon scandal, the victims of infected blood, and those who died in the terrible Grenfell Tower fire.’

Deborah Coles, director at INQUEST and Hillsborough Law Now, said the Bill was ‘a landmark step.

‘We have witnessed decades of institutional defensiveness and cruelty designed to evade scrutiny and accountability. We must now ensure the Hillsborough Law is delivered in full and those with vested interests to oppose it are resisted.’

It was not until 2016 that the Hillsborough inquests ruled the 97 were unlawfully killed—families campaigned to have the case reopened after a first inquest concluded ‘accidental death’ in 1991. Lord Justice Taylor’s inquiry, in 1990, concluded policing ‘broke down’. In 2012, the Hillsborough Independent Panel found police altered witness statements and tried to smear the victims. 

Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll