header-logo header-logo

06 October 2016
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hillsborough resilience recognised

Standing ovation for Marcia Willis Stewart & Elkan Abrahamson

Elkan Abrahamson of Broudie Jackson Canter and Marcia Willis Stewart of Birnberg Peirce—solicitors who became the legal faces of the Hillsborough campaign—were the popular winners of the Rule of Law award at this year’s Halsbury Legal Awards ceremony, held in association with NLJ, last week.

Marcia and Elkan were acknowledged for their unshakeable conviction to the pursuit of justice and for their determination to right the wrongs of the Hillsborough tragedy. Christian Fleck, LexisNexis Managing Director UK and Ireland, presented the trophies to Elkan’s daughter, Jessica, and Marcia to a standing ovation.

Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC was acknowleged for his relentless fight to protect people from discrimination and protect human rights and received the Lifetime Contribution award.

Professor William Twining FBA QC received the award for Academic Contribution. The judges applauded his outstanding joint editorship of the Law in Context series, through which he has nurtured generations of legal academics and others, publishing thought-provoking texts on diverse areas of law. The International Law Book Facility (ILBF) was the 2016 charity partner. Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice, and ILBF patron, spoke at the event about the charity’s history, achievements and ambitions.

The awards, which introduced in 2013 to celebrate the contributions of remarkable people across the legal profession, were presented across 10 other categories: Law in the Community/Pro Bono Award (Travers Smith); Legal Journalism Award (Catherine Baksi); Award for Diversity and Inclusion (the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy - Legal); PSL/Knowledge Lawyer Award (Jamini Raja, Professional Support Lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard); In-house Team of the Year (Lightsource Renewable Energy Holdings); Award for Innovation (Costs ADR); Legal PR/Media Comms Award (the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom); Award for Business Development (Gardner Leader); Law Firm of the Year—Exceptional Achievement, (Reed Smith); and Chambers of the Year—Exceptional Achievement (Radcliffe Chambers).

Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll