header-logo header-logo

HIP hype

28 February 2008 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Property
printer mail-detail

The government’s botched roll-out of HIPs is distorting the market, says Michael Garson

By a series of tactical withdrawals announced periodically since the beginning of January 2005, the government has pulled back from the implementation of the home information pack (HIP) as originally conceived. The relegation of the home condition report (HCR) in July 2006 considerably weakened the potential for the pack to change the culture of the buying and selling process, despite the publicity extolling the energy performance certificate (EPC) and recommendation report. Other changes to permit first day marketing and to limit the compulsory content of the pack have been made for pragmatic reasons. However, by reducing the extent of seller disclosures at the marketing stage, these measures have undermined the usefulness of the pack at the later contractual stages of a transaction. The pack went live on 1 August 2007 for four-bedroom homes only and, before any feedback from the market had been published, three-bedroom properties were added from 10 September. The requirements for local and drainage searches and additional leasehold

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll