header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Property
printer mail-detail

HIP hype

The government’s botched roll-out of HIPs is distorting the market, says Michael Garson

By a series of tactical withdrawals announced periodically since the beginning of January 2005, the government has pulled back from the implementation of the home information pack (HIP) as originally conceived. The relegation of the home condition report (HCR) in July 2006 considerably weakened the potential for the pack to change the culture of the buying and selling process, despite the publicity extolling the energy performance certificate (EPC) and recommendation report. Other changes to permit first day marketing and to limit the compulsory content of the pack have been made for pragmatic reasons. However, by reducing the extent of seller disclosures at the marketing stage, these measures have undermined the usefulness of the pack at the later contractual stages of a transaction. The pack went live on 1 August 2007 for four-bedroom homes only and, before any feedback from the market had been published, three-bedroom properties were added from 10 September. The requirements for local and drainage searches and additional leasehold

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll