header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Property
printer mail-detail

HIP hype

The government’s botched roll-out of HIPs is distorting the market, says Michael Garson

By a series of tactical withdrawals announced periodically since the beginning of January 2005, the government has pulled back from the implementation of the home information pack (HIP) as originally conceived. The relegation of the home condition report (HCR) in July 2006 considerably weakened the potential for the pack to change the culture of the buying and selling process, despite the publicity extolling the energy performance certificate (EPC) and recommendation report. Other changes to permit first day marketing and to limit the compulsory content of the pack have been made for pragmatic reasons. However, by reducing the extent of seller disclosures at the marketing stage, these measures have undermined the usefulness of the pack at the later contractual stages of a transaction. The pack went live on 1 August 2007 for four-bedroom homes only and, before any feedback from the market had been published, three-bedroom properties were added from 10 September. The requirements for local and drainage searches and additional leasehold

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll