header-logo header-logo

HIP operation

23 April 2009 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

HIPs—will they finally provide benefits? asks Peter Ambrose

The credibility of HIPs is certainly not helped by the lack of understanding among HIP providers of basic property legal issues, so it is hardly surprising that faith is often lacking in the accuracy of documents that they produce.

Until 6 April, most estate agents and clients had little to fear about the timely and accurate production of documentation. If the agent could be given an energy chart for their property particulars, then everyone was happy. This limited requirement clearly benefited those HIP providers with scant legal knowledge and ensured that HIPs remained as merely a legal formality that must be completed before contracts could be exchanged.

However, as sellers must now disclose more information about their property and the removal of the crutch of personal search insurance, issues concerning accountability and liability have come to the fore, and the emphasis has switched towards legal matters and responsibility for content.

Information questionnaire

Sellers must now complete a Property Information Questionnaire (PIQ) before an estate agent is allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll