header-logo header-logo

HIP operation

23 April 2009 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

HIPs—will they finally provide benefits? asks Peter Ambrose

The credibility of HIPs is certainly not helped by the lack of understanding among HIP providers of basic property legal issues, so it is hardly surprising that faith is often lacking in the accuracy of documents that they produce.

Until 6 April, most estate agents and clients had little to fear about the timely and accurate production of documentation. If the agent could be given an energy chart for their property particulars, then everyone was happy. This limited requirement clearly benefited those HIP providers with scant legal knowledge and ensured that HIPs remained as merely a legal formality that must be completed before contracts could be exchanged.

However, as sellers must now disclose more information about their property and the removal of the crutch of personal search insurance, issues concerning accountability and liability have come to the fore, and the emphasis has switched towards legal matters and responsibility for content.

Information questionnaire

Sellers must now complete a Property Information Questionnaire (PIQ) before an estate agent is allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll