header-logo header-logo

14 April 2011 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A hit at work

Keith Patten explores the difficulties involved in an employee suing their employer for an injury sustained in an attack at work

There are many workers who face the threat of assault in the course of their employment. In general the courts have been reluctant to find employers liable in negligence for injuries sustained in such assaults. In part this stems from underlying policy concerns to do with the nature of negligence law itself.

To a large extent, the modern law of negligence grew out of 19th century liberalism and notions of personal responsibility. Ideas of corrective justice are comfortable imposing liability on defendants for injuries which they have clearly caused. There is a reluctance to impose such liability where the direct and immediate cause is third party conduct, particularly where that conduct has elements of criminality (whether or not the assailant was, in fact, capable of forming the necessary mens rea of any offence).

Vaile v London Borough of Havering

The issue of an employer’s liability in negligence for the injuries suffered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll