header-logo header-logo

Hobson’s choice?

28 February 2014 / Alison Padfield
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
web_padfield

Alison Padfield considers the limits on the freedom to choose a lawyer

The freedom to choose a lawyer under a policy of before the event (BTE) legal expenses insurance is expressly set out in reg 6 of the Insurance Companies (Legal Expenses Insurance) Regulations 1990 (SI 1990/1159). The right is to choose a lawyer “to defend, represent or serve the interests of the insured in any inquiry or proceedings” (reg 6(1)), and there is also a right to do so at an earlier stage if a conflict of interest arises between the insurer and the insured (reg 6(2)). The regulations implement Directive 87/344/EEC, and reg 6, which requires the freedom to be expressly set out in the policy of legal expenses insurance, essentially reproduces the wording of Art 4 of the directive. Some aspects of the freedom have been considered in a series of recent cases, but important issues remain unresolved.

Does the freedom provide effective protection?

The freedom is to choose a lawyer in connection with “proceedings”. Most insureds would no doubt anticipate that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll