header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010 / Peter Hayden
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Holding court

Peter Hayden sheds light on Cayman’s new commercial court

On 2 November 2009 the Cayman Islands launched its new commercial court, in the form of the Financial Services Division (FSD) of the Grand Court.

The launch of the FSD is part of a restructuring of the court through the Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 2009 which came into force last November and divide the court into five divisions:
l Civil Division;
l Family Division;
l Admiralty Division;
l Criminal Division; and
l the FSD.

The FSD is dedicated to dealing with more complex and high value litigation and insolvency matters. New matters falling within the definition of “financial services proceedings” must be commenced in the FSD and transitional provisions apply to existing matters. The court is currently working to transfer appropriate existing cases into the FSD.

The definition includes proceedings relating to mutual funds and exempted insurers, regulatory applications, high value contract and trust disputes, applications under the Companies Law including insolvency matters, applications relating to cross-border insolvency proceedings and actions to enforce foreign judgments or arbitral awards.

Some of the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll