header-logo header-logo

Holiday fraud

10 August 2018
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has fired off a warning on false holiday sickness claims. 

The SRA currently has 18 cases under investigation involving solicitors and false holiday sickness claims. It reminded solicitors this week that they should check the veracity of cases, including by searching through social media posts.

Recent issues of concern include solicitors acting where they had no skill in the area, failing to verify the source of the client referral, making unreasonable requests for disclosure, and failing to advise clients about what would be expected of them when making a claim. Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Any solicitor handling holiday sickness claims must carry out proper due diligence, make sure they advise clients properly and that they are dealing with a genuine case.’

Issue: 7806 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll