header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 7806

17 August 2018
IN THIS ISSUE

Even the most eminent expert must comply with the admissibility rules, says Mark Solon

Is a Crown expert witness part of the team or independent? Chris Pamplin looks at the costs implications

Joy of the stay over; brief work; (in)solving nothing.

Giles Eyre & Linda Monaci present a case study on mental capacity to litigate, including key learning points for practitioners

Ewan Paton on a 90 year-old wrinkle in the Law of Property Act 1925

Dr Michael Arnheim takes issue with the conviction of two schoolboys for conspiracy to murder through a Columbine-style shooting

​Graeme Fraser assesses the impact of equal civil partnerships on cohabitation reform

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll