header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 17 August 2018

16 August 2018
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Joy of the stay over; brief work; (in)solving nothing.

THE OVERNIGHT GAME

Child support maintenance will be reduced if the payer (to hell with the statutory jargon) has one or more of the children with them for at least 52 nights a year (for example, by one-seventh for 52 to 103 nights in the year). Cynics would have you believe that the reduction scheme within sch 1 to the Child Support Act 1991 and regs 46 and 47 of the Child Support Maintenance Calculations Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/2677) is occasionally the driving force behind the payer’s court application for increased contact.

In JS v SSWP and another [2018] UKUT 181 (AAC) the Upper Tribunal drew attention to the fact that the current calculations regulations differ from their predecessors in that the maintenance assessment is to look forward for 12 months from the effective date. What has to be determined is the number of nights the payer is expected to have care during the 12 month period. The regulations provide that in making the determination

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll