header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 17 August 2018

16 August 2018
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Joy of the stay over; brief work; (in)solving nothing.

THE OVERNIGHT GAME

Child support maintenance will be reduced if the payer (to hell with the statutory jargon) has one or more of the children with them for at least 52 nights a year (for example, by one-seventh for 52 to 103 nights in the year). Cynics would have you believe that the reduction scheme within sch 1 to the Child Support Act 1991 and regs 46 and 47 of the Child Support Maintenance Calculations Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/2677) is occasionally the driving force behind the payer’s court application for increased contact.

In JS v SSWP and another [2018] UKUT 181 (AAC) the Upper Tribunal drew attention to the fact that the current calculations regulations differ from their predecessors in that the maintenance assessment is to look forward for 12 months from the effective date. What has to be determined is the number of nights the payer is expected to have care during the 12 month period. The regulations provide that in making the determination

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll