header-logo header-logo

16 August 2018 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A conspiracy too far?

nlj_7806_arnheim

Dr Michael Arnheim takes issue with the conviction of two schoolboys for conspiracy to murder through a Columbine-style shooting

  • Two 15-year-old boys were convicted of conspiracy to murder teachers and pupils at their school in imitation of the 1999 Columbine massacre—even though they had no weapons and had evidently never handled a firearm.
  • The statutory law of conspiracy, drafted on the basis of a Law Commission recommendation, is not fit for purpose.
  • The Law Commission’s Draft Bill (2009), published as part of a moribund codification programme, is even worse.

On 20 July 2018, two 15-year-old boys, Thomas Wyllie and Alex Bolland, were convicted of a conspiracy (when aged 14) to murder teachers and pupils at their own school by shooting them in a re-enactment of the Columbine school massacre in Colorado in 1999. They were sentenced to 12 and 10 years’ imprisonment, respectively.

In sentencing, the judge emphasised: ‘The conspiracy to murder of which you have been convicted was not wishful thinking or a fantasy. It was a real plot:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll