header-logo header-logo

A conspiracy too far?

16 August 2018 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7806_arnheim

Dr Michael Arnheim takes issue with the conviction of two schoolboys for conspiracy to murder through a Columbine-style shooting

  • Two 15-year-old boys were convicted of conspiracy to murder teachers and pupils at their school in imitation of the 1999 Columbine massacre—even though they had no weapons and had evidently never handled a firearm.
  • The statutory law of conspiracy, drafted on the basis of a Law Commission recommendation, is not fit for purpose.
  • The Law Commission’s Draft Bill (2009), published as part of a moribund codification programme, is even worse.

On 20 July 2018, two 15-year-old boys, Thomas Wyllie and Alex Bolland, were convicted of a conspiracy (when aged 14) to murder teachers and pupils at their own school by shooting them in a re-enactment of the Columbine school massacre in Colorado in 1999. They were sentenced to 12 and 10 years’ imprisonment, respectively.

In sentencing, the judge emphasised: ‘The conspiracy to murder of which you have been convicted was not wishful thinking or a fantasy. It was a real plot:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll