header-logo header-logo

Practical advice on capacity to litigate

16 August 2018 / Giles Eyre , Linda Monaci
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Mental health
printer mail-detail
nlj_7806_monaci

Giles Eyre & Linda Monaci present a case study on mental capacity to litigate, including key learning points for practitioners

  • Illustrates the challenges for solicitors and experts via a fictitious example of a borderline mental capacity case.

John, now 19 years old, is pursuing a personal injury claim against his employer. He had sustained a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and some orthopaedic injuries in an accident at work. Liability was established at trial but damages are yet to be assessed.

Background history

John lived in a flat organised by social services from the age of 13 years of age due to physical abuse by his mother and step-father. He left school at 15. He regularly smoked cannabis and for a period also heroin. He worked six months on a building site but left after an argument with his manager. Just before the index event he found further employment on a building site, where the accident occurred.

At discharge from hospital, he returned to his flat. He received little community

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll