header-logo header-logo

02 May 2025 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8114 / Categories: Features , International
printer mail-detail

Holy smoke

217259
As the world waits to find out who will become the next pope, Athelstane Aamodt explains how the Catholic Church will make the decision

How does the Catholic Church decide who is going to be pope? Most people seem to be aware of the College of Cardinals, which gathers to form a conclave that meets and votes in secret until one of their number has achieved enough votes. What perhaps fewer people know about is the complex laws that govern papal elections, and how they came into being. 

The use of cardinals to elect a pope was only codified in 1059 by Pope Nicholas II. Before then, the appointment of popes was haphazard. In 236, a dove landed on the head on the future Fabian II and, according to Eusebius of Caesarea (265-339), ‘thereupon the people, all as if impelled by one divine spirit, with one united and eager voice cried out that he was worthy, and immediately they set him on the episcopal seat’. The Eastern Roman Emperor, Justinian I (527-565), after he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll